Started By
Message

re: Why did Hurricane Michael not get nearly the coverage that Hurricane Florence did?

Posted on 10/12/18 at 4:21 am to
Posted by RobDione
Pensacola Beach
Member since Nov 2007
733 posts
Posted on 10/12/18 at 4:21 am to
For the same reasons that the Baton Rouge flood got nearly zero coverage .... that s all Ill say.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85467 posts
Posted on 10/12/18 at 7:16 am to
quote:

For the same reasons that the Baton Rouge flood got nearly zero coverage .... that s all Ill say.



Yeah -

A) the amount of storm build up wasn't there. It wasn't a category 3 or 4 until 24 hours from landfall. Baton Rouge system didn't even have a name

B) the amount of people affected or potentially affected pales in comparison to the amount of people living from Wilmington northward along the east coast. If people can't understand why a storm threatening that shear amount of people gets more coverage, I don't know what to tell you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram