- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did Hurricane Michael not get nearly the coverage that Hurricane Florence did?
Posted on 10/12/18 at 4:21 am to PrimeTime Money
Posted on 10/12/18 at 4:21 am to PrimeTime Money
For the same reasons that the Baton Rouge flood got nearly zero coverage .... that s all Ill say.
Posted on 10/12/18 at 7:16 am to RobDione
quote:
For the same reasons that the Baton Rouge flood got nearly zero coverage .... that s all Ill say.
Yeah -
A) the amount of storm build up wasn't there. It wasn't a category 3 or 4 until 24 hours from landfall. Baton Rouge system didn't even have a name
B) the amount of people affected or potentially affected pales in comparison to the amount of people living from Wilmington northward along the east coast. If people can't understand why a storm threatening that shear amount of people gets more coverage, I don't know what to tell you.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News