- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:56 am to nicholastiger
I agree.
Let’s look at the facts.
A felon has a weapon.
Draws it at a person who calls the cops.
I bet they have that on camera and if so there is evidence.
Alton, would have committed a crime at that point if I am correct.
Police respond and a felon struggles, fights, or basically resist a search.
The weapon is found on Alton who is a felon.
He was killed in the process of hiding a criminal act.
If I am correct or not please let me know.
The above looks like facts we know.
Now, the family wants to file a suit against BRPD, due to their family member committed a crime and resisted a search to hide a criminal act?
Is this not correct?
Now they dig up an email about one of the officer involved where he had no discipline action at that time to prove the email valid. He also did not have a hearing to defend himself as no action was brought against him at that time.
I know the city will settle, but this smells like a load of dog doo doo.
Let’s look at the facts.
A felon has a weapon.
Draws it at a person who calls the cops.
I bet they have that on camera and if so there is evidence.
Alton, would have committed a crime at that point if I am correct.
Police respond and a felon struggles, fights, or basically resist a search.
The weapon is found on Alton who is a felon.
He was killed in the process of hiding a criminal act.
If I am correct or not please let me know.
The above looks like facts we know.
Now, the family wants to file a suit against BRPD, due to their family member committed a crime and resisted a search to hide a criminal act?
Is this not correct?
Now they dig up an email about one of the officer involved where he had no discipline action at that time to prove the email valid. He also did not have a hearing to defend himself as no action was brought against him at that time.
I know the city will settle, but this smells like a load of dog doo doo.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)