- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do Republicans ignore Divorce and Male Reproductive Rights for Men
Posted on 8/30/18 at 9:35 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/30/18 at 9:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Link?
Here's a case from Texas.
Oklahoma
Here's an op-ed that mentions several cases.
Here is an article outlining statutory rape victims who have had to pay child support.
I'm sure I could find more, but it is definitely a widespread problem.
Posted on 8/30/18 at 9:50 am to imjustafatkid
quote:disgusting that this is allowed
I'm sure I could find more, but it is definitely a widespread problem.
This post was edited on 8/30/18 at 9:50 am
Posted on 8/30/18 at 10:08 am to imjustafatkid
quote:That is not remotely on point.
Here's a case from Texas.
This guy got sued for support, and he ignored the Citation that was served upon him. He claims that he did not receive it, but two different hearings separated by YEARS found otherwise (one a hearing on his original default and a second recent hearing).
Texas judges look SERIOUSLY at proper service before granting default judgments.
If a court had found that he was not served back in the day, the case would start over, the DNA would be admissible, and he would owe no support.
Instead, he got sued, ignored it, had a judgment taken against him and wants a do-over many years down the line.
The lesson here is “Do not ignore the Citation when You Get Sued.”
This post was edited on 8/30/18 at 10:13 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News