Started By
Message

re: VolTiger -Kristian Fulton

Posted on 7/18/18 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Fuzzybunz
Member since Jan 2017
268 posts
Posted on 7/18/18 at 12:33 pm to
They are arguing he falls under Section 3.3 which claims a violation if a tester
fails to provide a urine specimen according to protocol; (this is why they are arguing the collection process, he gave a sample it just didn’t follow normal procedure)

If the NCAA agrees with this then it is viewed as a positive test result and carries a one year suspension which he will have already served.

In my opinion this can be a win-win for the NCAA and Fulton. The NCAA doesn’t need to cave into demands just acknowledge there is a different violation that could be assigned to him. Fulton is still considered guilty and has served punishment and still sees the field a year early.
Posted by VolTiger13
New Orleans, La
Member since Jul 2017
3884 posts
Posted on 7/18/18 at 12:48 pm to
Which makes sense as to why we're going for the "time served" plea.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram