Started By
Message

re: The case for Kristian Fulton and why he should be reinstated

Posted on 6/13/18 at 10:27 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65532 posts
Posted on 6/13/18 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

It's really hard for the NCAA to argue actual tampering when the kid throws away the other urine on his own accord and then submits a real sample of his own to the administrator. Forget the fact that it came up clean for PEDs.

If they had the vial or whatever he had to store the 3rd party sample, then all they would have to show is that container and any residue of foreign urine on it. This isn't as complex as you're making it out to be and would be a fairly easy burden to carry if Fulton brings it to court. There is a rule that specifically bars attempting to falsify a urine test. James Banks from Tennessee was busted 15 or so years ago for possessing a fake penis to try to pass a test. He never actually used it but he was suspended by the NCAA all the same because just having something like that warrants a suspension.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram