Started By
Message

re: (Delete)

Posted on 6/12/18 at 11:31 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Seriously, how did this term get thrown into politics all of the sudden?
It didn't just get thrown into politics all of a sudden. There are videos of Hannity, Bolton, etc. saying the same thing when Obama said he was willing to talk to NK.

And I'm sure it goes back much further from both sides. It seems like a stupid talking point for the most part, but it's not new and not exclusive to the left.
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 11:33 am
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33994 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 11:34 am to
quote:

”normalizing" is the other word worth noting like when Spicer appeared at the Oscars (or whatever award show it was) and hollywood went bonkers on social media about how this "normalizes" him by giving him this platform.


There it is, that’s the other word I was looking for! I think my Fallon interview example falls into this, and you are right about Spicer.

The two go hand in hand, same criticism at heart. I edited my OP to include it
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 11:38 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25255 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 11:35 am to
It isn't a new concept. The weaponization of the term against political opposition is the concept that is new. The use of the term with regard to DPRK's leader is foolishness. He is the leader of a nation-state. He already has referential power. His nation state has nuclear weapons. The idea that he isn't "legitimized" is stupid.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram