Started By
Message

re: Did the FBI ever confirm that the Russians hacked the DNC?

Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

And the FBI refused to subpoena the server. But lets just carry on, on unverified information.

So fricked up.

So corrupt.


That entire situation was a joke.

I have NEVER heard of the FBI not taking physical custody of computer in a hacking case. EVER.

This is how those things are typically handled. The FBI takes physical custody of the server and then mirrors the hard drive(s) and puts the original server in storage and runs a forensic analysis on the copy. Because having physical custody of the unmanipulated original hard drive is THAT important when making a case.

The FBI didn't even take custody of the DNC server , which tells a thinking person the DNC didn't actually want their server investigated.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5251 posts
Posted on 6/6/18 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

I have NEVER heard of the FBI not taking physical custody of computer in a hacking case. EVER. 

This is how those things are typically handled. The FBI takes physical custody of the server and then mirrors the hard drive(s) and puts the original server in storage and runs a forensic analysis on the copy. Because having physical custody of the unmanipulated original hard drive is THAT important when making a case. 

That and the all important "chain of custody" that must be established for any evidence in a criminal investigation to proceed to trial.

Think about it. The FBI investigated a crime and chose to proceed in such a way that would be inadmissible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram