- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about property ownership
Posted on 6/4/18 at 1:41 pm to 70739tigah
Posted on 6/4/18 at 1:41 pm to 70739tigah
Always love the responses on legal threads...either her name is on the title with him or it is not. When acquiring the property, the act of sale document (i.e. "Cash Sale") lists the names of the seller(s) and buyer(s). If he is the only named "buyer" then she has no ownership interest and the property would be his separate property. If the mortgage was paid with his separate property as you claim, then she would have no claim to any type of reimbursement.
Under the facts as you have described them, the woman would have no claim to ownership.
Under the facts as you have described them, the woman would have no claim to ownership.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 1:48 pm to NOLA Tiger
If he didn't do the steps I described above, she would have a claim to reimbursement. Check dat civil code baw
ETA: It's Civil Code Art. 2339. Just so you don't have to search that I'm right lol
ETA: It's Civil Code Art. 2339. Just so you don't have to search that I'm right lol
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 2:04 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)