- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/28/18 at 6:57 pm to hrryhll
quote:
refuse to answer because you completely changed the scenario to which I was arguing. I know your game.
Wrong. You can pick any scenario. Any at all.
You’re a bad guy looking to do harm. You have two identical targets, one is armed, one is unarmed.
Who do you chose to commit your crime against?
It could literally be anything. You could be a rapist choosing between to girls to rape. One is armed one isn’t.
You’re a thief. You have to targets to steal from. One is armed one isn’t.
You’re looking to shoot up a building, do you go to a police station and shoot it up, or a school and shoot it up?
It’s a simple question with a simple answer.
You always choose the target that is unarmed over armed. But you can’t say that. Because when you say that, it completely ruins your argument for banning knives and guns.
This post was edited on 5/28/18 at 7:00 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News