Started By
Message

re: Would you rather have gone “over the top” in WWI or been on the first wave on D-Day?

Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:52 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65074 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Estimated that 27,000 French soldiers were killed on August 22, 1914


And let’s not forget on the FIRST DAY of the Battle of the Somme, the British suffered 57,000 casualties, including jsut shy of 20,000 killed. And that battle raged from July 1 to Nov. 1. By the time it was over almost half a million British soldiers would become causalties. The French (who were losing about a half million at Verdin AT THE SAME TIME) lost 200,000 on the Somme as well. The Germans lost about a half a million on the Somme while also losing almost 400,000 at Verdun.

And this was 1916. The war was already two years in with almost another two years to go.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29409 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:55 pm to
WWI was crazy. Americans generally ignore it because we were not a major contributor to it. The sheer scope of death on the frontlines was staggering.

Another note on the discussion, going over the top in WWI would mean facing frontline troops where in WW2, the German Army was being bled dry in the Eastern Front.

The real question is whether you would rather go over the top in WWI or face a banzai charge in WW2.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram