Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:41 pm to
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

So I’m guessing you think only one agency should handle domestic investigations?

If not, then who else, besides the marshals, would be best equiped to expand into that role?



Well . . .

If you don’t like the FBI, I guess you could create a new agency. But it’s odd to see a conservative arguing for governmental expansion.

Asking the marshalls to handle investigations is like asking the FAA to handle highways. It’s not what they do.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16303 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:57 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 5:48 pm
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/5/18 at 3:34 am to
How about burning the top 3 levels of the fbi hierarchy to the ground and starting over?

Oh wait that is already happening but you cannot leave any roaches in the building because they breed
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125490 posts
Posted on 5/5/18 at 6:13 am to
quote:

If you don’t like the FBI
Holy strawman, Batman!

"If you don’t like the FBI"????

You mean to say you do like an agency as powerful as the FBI run by a J Edgar Hoover Wannabe? You're fine with an agency creating smut out of thin air, then attempting to use it to influence high government officials to support whatever policies the FBI Director deems worthy?

You like that FBI?

Posted by TuDog
Boston
Member since Jun 2005
4260 posts
Posted on 5/5/18 at 11:19 am to
quote:

If you don’t like the FBI,


Yeah, it's about this
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram