- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Tax Windfall Going to Capex Way Faster Than Stock Buyback, largest capex in 7 years
Posted on 5/3/18 at 10:05 am to 90proofprofessional
Posted on 5/3/18 at 10:05 am to 90proofprofessional
Pardon my ignorance, but wouldn't the ideal result be somewhere near an even split between capex and investment?
For example, this part:
Seems to paint shareholders with a very broad brush. How many people that aren't Wall Street fat cats are shareholders? Pension and other retirement funds?
I understand from the article and posts including yours that capex is seen as better for long term corporate health, but it's not like with buybacks/dividends the money is getting burned or buried. Are we splitting hairs?
For example, this part:
quote:
head directly to the stock market and be harvested by shareholders already fattened by a nine-year bull market.
Seems to paint shareholders with a very broad brush. How many people that aren't Wall Street fat cats are shareholders? Pension and other retirement funds?
I understand from the article and posts including yours that capex is seen as better for long term corporate health, but it's not like with buybacks/dividends the money is getting burned or buried. Are we splitting hairs?
Posted on 5/3/18 at 12:14 pm to Havoc
quote:
wouldn't the ideal result be somewhere near an even split between capex and investment
capex is just a subset of investment
usually it's taken to mean investment in physical capital like machinery (best) or other physical property
quote:
understand from the article and posts including yours that capex is seen as better for long term corporate health
it's far more important than just corporate health. in supply-side theory, that investment is what drives increases in worker productivity and leads to the real economic growth, the kind that sustains itself
quote:
it's not like with buybacks/dividends the money is getting burned or buried
it's true that consumption made possible by those buybacks/dividends stimulates the economy too via the demand channel. and some of that may eventually go back to physical capex somewhere else. but to the extent those resources go to consumption rather than investment, the supply-side impact is watered down
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News