Started By
Message

re: Newly released 9/11 footage of Pentagon: Airliner or missile?

Posted on 4/27/18 at 11:50 am to
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 11:50 am to
quote:

That shitty late ‘90s technology “video” has a frame rate of about 1/second. The frame rate is so low relative to the speed of the plane that it effectively misses it. You can’t take away much from video of that low of IQ and slow of frame rate. It’s like a blurry 1970s photo of “Bigfoot”. If someone shot it at 60 fps in 1080p and it looked like that, I’d be on board with you. But what you have with this crap video is essentially an ink blot test. Sorry.


I agree but my question is why is that the only video we have ever seen from the Pentagon crash? The Pentagon is the most secure building on the planet and there have to be hundreds, if not thousands, of videos from this incident. Why haven’t they at least released a better clip of the plane approaching the Pentagon when it would have instantly shut up all of the 9/11 truthers?
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39311 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:00 pm to
There's a gas station across the street from the Pentagon that the FBI seized security camera tape from almost immediately after. There are plenty of angles of this attack, not just from Pentagon cameras.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

The Pentagon is the most secure building on the planet and there have to be hundreds, if not thousands, of videos from this incident.

Even back then there probably were a lot of surveillance cameras in the buildings areas and any areas of entrance from the ground. Long distance vids of the general grounds, maybe not so much.
That said, how many does one need to show an airplane crashing into the side of a building in order to tell that its..well..an airplane crashing into the side of a building?
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:15 pm to
How old are you?

I’m not trying to be insulting. I’m dead serious.

In case you aren’t aware, back in 2001, this was a typical cell phone:



No camera. No video. Texting was new and hardly anyone did it.

People weren’t carrying around video cameras. Or any camera at all.

Buildings, even government ones, didn’t have a proliferation of surveillance cameras. There were probably only cameras at the gates and on the doors, and they were low quality and expensive.

Having high quality, cheap cameras everywhere is a thing from the last 5 years. Don’t project current technology, practices, and quality back on 2001. It was a simpler, lower fidelity time.
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 12:17 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

I agree but my question is why is that the only video we have ever seen from the Pentagon crash?


Because this happened in 2001

Cellphones didn't have cameras, very few external security systems were full motion capture and the side of the pentagon hit was under construction.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram