- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Winners and Losers from Round 1
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:13 am to Seeker
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:13 am to Seeker
quote:
Exactly. The prognosticators would have loved it if we made the same trade to get a QB that is not going to be ready for at least 2 years and is well know to be a huge project as a passer.
I find it hilarious that all the talking heads on ESPN were shocked we didn't trade up for Jackson when he would have been there for us regardless at 27
So I guess they would have rather the Saints use two first rounders to move up for a guy who would have fell to us anyways
1
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:20 am to Packer
And he would have not have seen the field for at least 2 years. It is absolutely ridiculous to listen to the criticism that the Saint are getting for this pick.
The Saints are in win now mode: So they should have picked a project QB that won't help them win now.
The Saints took a raw DE with tremendous upside: So they should have taken an even more raw QB prospect whose biggest knock is he needs A LOT of work to develop as an NFL passes.
The Saints gave up too much for Davenport: So the Saints should have made the same trade to take a more risky player.
WTF is wrong with people? Sure Davenport is a risky pick. So was Lattimore. So was Kamara. So was Ramczyk.
But you can't tell me that Jackson was less risky, more developed at his position, and in a better position to help the team win now than Davenport.
The Saints are in win now mode: So they should have picked a project QB that won't help them win now.
The Saints took a raw DE with tremendous upside: So they should have taken an even more raw QB prospect whose biggest knock is he needs A LOT of work to develop as an NFL passes.
The Saints gave up too much for Davenport: So the Saints should have made the same trade to take a more risky player.
WTF is wrong with people? Sure Davenport is a risky pick. So was Lattimore. So was Kamara. So was Ramczyk.
But you can't tell me that Jackson was less risky, more developed at his position, and in a better position to help the team win now than Davenport.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News