Started By
Message

re: Why Stormy Daniels is Dangerous - Beyond STD Potential

Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:19 am to
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15113 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:19 am to
The op was referring to personal privacy when it came to personal issues or indiscretions.

The problem with the NDA is that you can't stop someone from talking about it, you can only get damages after they do it. Trump's team has claimed Stormy has already violated the NDA 20 times and she could owe 20mill. It doesn't matter if they go after her for $500k or 20milllion she can't pay it. If they go after her she has nothing to lose by not telling the whole story.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15920 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 11:58 am to
CBS has $20million, and has assisted her in a knowing breach of a contractual obligation to keep something private.

I see nothing different btwn this and the agreeement btwn you and your bank to avoid disclosing your credit card/checking account number.

Effectively, yes, all he can do is sue for damages, which he should.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432376 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

The problem with the NDA is that you can't stop someone from talking about it, you can only get damages after they do it. Trump's team has claimed Stormy has already violated the NDA 20 times and she could owe 20mill. It doesn't matter if they go after her for $500k or 20milllion she can't pay it. If they go after her she has nothing to lose by not telling the whole story.

i believe it's possible to get an injunction

so then violation would be subject to possible court oversight
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram