- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If your kid called you from school and said there was an active shooter?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:11 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:11 pm to Pettifogger
quote:Okay dickhead, enough of the bullshite hypotheticals.
So realistically, are we talking about requiring teachers to be armed or merely allowing them to arm themselves if they wish?
If the latter, which seems far more likely, then yes, I think there is a close to zero chance it would have made any difference.
If the fricking coach that took a bullet for his students would have been armed, do you think there would have possibly been a different outcome?
3
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:15 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:Well since he was a security officer, then maybe, but there is a good chance he would have protected the students first anyways.
Okay dickhead, enough of the bull shite hypotheticals.
If the fricking coach that took a bullet for his students would have been armed, do you think there would have possibly been a different outcome?
But I do think it would make more sense, and potentially more effective to have SROs trained to respond. More effective than teachers.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:23 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Okay dickhead, enough of the bullshite hypotheticals.
Stop being emotional you whiny twat. Communicate like an adult.
quote:
If the fricking coach that took a bullet for his students would have been armed, do you think there would have possibly been a different outcome?
Possibly? Sure. Likely? Probably not.
But even that possibility, whatever it may be, is dependent on that teacher electing to be armed, being armed that day, and being in a position to deploy a weapon.
Again "any chance is better than nothing" is a totally different argument than "you can't tell me it wouldn't have made a difference."
Posted on 2/17/18 at 2:25 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
If the latter, which seems far more likely, then yes, I think there is a close to zero chance it would have made any difference
quote:
If the fricking coach that took a bullet for his students would have been armed, do you think there would have possibly been a different outcome?
I don't get the people with the mindset that if a possible solution is not 100% effective than there is not point in doing it. If that coach had been given the choice of being unarmed, or armed, but with only a 1% chance of taking down the shooter I have no doubt about which he would have chosen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News