re: For Episcopalians, God is Officially Gender Fluid (or whatever)

quote:

---

"proving the negative" is a logic flaw.

---

that's not what i'm asking. in that case, the person is making the positive assertion that it is not. iow, that something else is the case. i'm asking that person to prove their belief. of course holding the winning hand, i know they can't.

this speaks to the presumption of atheism which many, many people have been fooled by. thus, atheism becomes the default position and is in no need of substantiation, which is obviously ridiculous

quote:

---

The burden of proof would be on the people who believe it IS divinely inspired, not the other way around

---

another typical misunderstanding. the burden of proof is on anyone asserting anything. there is no person/position that does not bear the burden of proof