- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So, assuming Canada stays............here's what I find problematic
Posted on 1/4/18 at 2:22 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 1/4/18 at 2:22 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
By acknowledging that I overstated. See. Simple. It is still unusual for him.
Fair enough. My assertion which I had with a previous poster was that weather was a factor. Both games had wet, windy conditions which slow the speed of the field. In addition, as the announcers mentioned ND was bringing up safeties to defend the jet sweep. It was defended too well so why risk losing 5-8 yards and killing a drive?
Canada himself stated he will adjust to his team strengths and the other's weaknesses. ND took the jet sweep away. I take Canada at his word.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 3:30 pm to BayouCowboy
quote:
Canada himself stated he will adjust to his team strengths and the other's weaknesses. ND took the jet sweep away. I take Canada at his word.
The jet sweep creates similar problems for the defense as the RPO and Double/Triple Option offense but it can be ran with a non or less-than mobile QB. Thats why he ran it with Peterman and Etling.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)