Started By
Message

re: So, assuming Canada stays............here's what I find problematic

Posted on 1/4/18 at 2:22 pm to
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14559 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

By acknowledging that I overstated. See. Simple. It is still unusual for him.

Fair enough. My assertion which I had with a previous poster was that weather was a factor. Both games had wet, windy conditions which slow the speed of the field. In addition, as the announcers mentioned ND was bringing up safeties to defend the jet sweep. It was defended too well so why risk losing 5-8 yards and killing a drive?

Canada himself stated he will adjust to his team strengths and the other's weaknesses. ND took the jet sweep away. I take Canada at his word.
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 1/4/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Canada himself stated he will adjust to his team strengths and the other's weaknesses. ND took the jet sweep away. I take Canada at his word.


The jet sweep creates similar problems for the defense as the RPO and Double/Triple Option offense but it can be ran with a non or less-than mobile QB. Thats why he ran it with Peterman and Etling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram