- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:00 pm to GoldenBoy
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:00 pm to GoldenBoy
The browns have serviceable running backs already.
The Browns need to use the great majority of this draft to form a future elite offensive line.
You can at least get back on the right track with a top notch offensive line, Kizer, Crowell/Johnson and Gordon.
The Browns should absolutely not draft a QB. Cleveland is where QB's go to end their career before it starts. Not to mention, the QB doesn't matter if he can't take 3 steps without getting hit.
The Browns need to use the great majority of this draft to form a future elite offensive line.
You can at least get back on the right track with a top notch offensive line, Kizer, Crowell/Johnson and Gordon.
The Browns should absolutely not draft a QB. Cleveland is where QB's go to end their career before it starts. Not to mention, the QB doesn't matter if he can't take 3 steps without getting hit.
2
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:05 pm to dcrews
I don't think Kizer is the long term answer.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:12 pm to dcrews
quote:
The Browns should absolutely not draft a QB. Cleveland is where QB's go to end their career before it starts. Not to mention, the QB doesn't matter if he can't take 3 steps without getting hit.
Browns spend like 100 million on their Oline last offseason.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News