re: Wife having a child while married that isn't yours

The courts first priority is the welfare of the child - at least that's the position they claim they are taking. Meaning, it's a greater tragedy for a child to suffer than a non-biological father to pay child support. Oddly enough, the court doesn't mandate that the mother itemize the money spent directly on the child to verify that the child is being cared for.

I am no a lawyer, this is just my limited knowledge of what I have read and discussed with those in the legal profession. Any true lawyers feel free to correct me if wrong and I will gladly retract my statement.

One last thing, if this thread pisses you off, watch "The Red Pill" on Netflix. It's chock full of examples how men get shafted when it comes to parental and domestic rights.