Started By
Message

re: .308 vs .270. Which should I get?

Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:03 pm to
Posted by boatless2
Member since Mar 2015
612 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:03 pm to
Neither, why not go with 6.5 creedmoor?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:21 pm to
Because frick that caliber, that’s why. I hate it.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 12/19/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Neither, why not go with 6.5 creedmoor?


Because it’s a well marketed round that fills no gap.

It’s a great round and shots and kills well, but is by no means revolutionary. The Swede and the 260 rem have been doing the same thing for a long time.

First, the creedmoor has great BC that also make it a great long range TARGET rifle. At ranges inside 300 yards, which arguably it’s effective hunting range, it’s just another 140gr bullet in a compact rifle.

So, why the 260 over the creedmoor? They are pretty much the same round. The difference being a negligibly higher case capacity due to it being a necked down 30TC, another obscure round that wil not help if you find yourself needing brass for your 260.

The old 260 is simply a necked down 308, which you can find anywhere. Not to mention that 260 ammo is possibly easier to find to begin with.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram