- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our President's attorney's allege illegal conduct by Robert Mueller
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:57 am to Jbird
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:57 am to Jbird
quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
4th Amendment is pretty clear, gotta have a warrant. Also some of these emails would have been discussions with transition team lawyers and fall under lawyer client privilege.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 11:58 am
1
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:06 pm to golfntiger32
quote:
4th Amendment is pretty clear, gotta have a warrant. Also some of these emails would have been discussions with transition team lawyers and fall under lawyer client privilege.
This simply isn't true. There is no requirement that there MUST be a warrant.
If you voluntarily give evidence to LEOs they can use it without a warrant. And that's what happened here, the GSA willingly gave that material to Mueller.
Now the attorney client privilege still exists here where applicable.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News