quote:
Lue Elizondo spoke at the Scientific Coalition for Ufology’s Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena Conference on 3-15-19. Various attendees of the conference took photographs and recordings of the speech and shared them online.

Deep Prasad shared this photo and also claims (this is unverified) that Metamaterial results and analysis will be covered in the upcoming TTSA documentary TV show on The History Channel.

quote:
What makes this material so special? Now, in some cases, this material… was told it’s special. Through analysis…guess what? Not so special. Some of it is absolutely special. I won’t point out which ones on that slide but there are some that are absolutely special and have been briefed to some very, very senior levels of this government, and they do remarkable and extraordinary things and they’re built in such a way that to this day we still can’t replicate them…to this day. So, that should be very telling. Material science is a critical piece of this. You can’t just sit there and say, ‘Ah ha! I told you so.’ That’s not what this is about. This is not…this effort is not about satisfying the natural curiosity of people who want to know right now and I sad before, there’s a difference in giving information right and giving it right now.”

—-

Notice the Vatican listed above...

https://www.catholicleague.org/vatican-hiding-aliens/

quote:
IS THE VATICAN HIDING ALIENS?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/the-vatican-on-space-the-discovery-of-intelligent-life-wouldnt-mean-theres-an-alien-jesus-somewhere-10433527.html

quote:
The Vatican on space: The discovery of intelligent life wouldn't mean there's an alien Jesus somewhere in the universe
The Vatican has its own astronomy programme
Abby Ohlheiser Sunday 2 August 2015 16:30 29 comments

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1802

quote:
Dear John,

Because the War in Space race is heating up, I felt you should be aware of several factors as you and I schedule our Skype talk. Remember, our nonviolent ETI from the contiguous universe are helping us bring zero point energy to Earth. They will not tolerate any forms of military violence on Earth or in space. The following information in italics was shared with me by my colleague Carol Rosin, who worked closely for several years with Wernher von Braun before his death. Carol and I have worked on the Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, attached for your convenience.

quote:
We're arguably closer than ever to war in space. Most satellites orbiting Earth belong to the U.S., China and Russia. And recent tests of anti-satellite weapons don't exactly ease the scare factor. It sounds like science fiction, but the potential for real-life star wars is real enough. It's just not new. Fears of battles in space go back to the Cold War and several initiatives, like President Reagan's "Star Wars" missile-defense system. Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work spoke to Congress in June about the threat. He said during a speech the technology the U.S. developed during the Cold War allows it "to project more power, more precisely, more swiftly, at less cost." Take a moment to think about everything satellites do. GPS, surveillance and communications all depend on them. And the Scientific American notes you can disable satellites without missiles. Simply spray-painting lenses or breaking antennas is enough. President Obama requested $5 billion for space defense in the 2016 fiscal budget. And a former Air Force officer told the Scientific American most of the United States' capabilities in space have been declassified to send a clear message: There are no rules for war in space.

Best regards,
Edgar Edgar D. Mitchell, ScD Apollo 14 astronaut
6th man to walk on the Moon
Zero Point Energy Consultant

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ThinePreparedAni

In a sea of cognitive dissonance

Member since Mar 2013

11091 posts

Posted on 4/24/19 at 3:01 pm to ThinePreparedAni

quote:
The Vatican on space: The discovery of intelligent life wouldn't mean there's an alien Jesus somewhere in the universe
The Vatican has its own astronomy programme

I held off on posting this last week...

This unifies some of my rifting here about Prometheus (for those who think this is just a space movie about aliens...)

https://www.indiewire.com/2012/06/did-ridley-scott-just-ruin-the-mystery-of-prometheus-kill-its-sequel-109273/

quote:
Did Ridley Scott Just Ruin The Mystery Of ‘Prometheus’ & Kill Its Sequel?
Did Ridley Scott Just Ruin The Mystery Of 'Prometheus' & Kill Its Sequel? Kevin Jagernauth

quote:
So, depending on which side of the fence you’re sitting on, “Prometheus” either explained too much or didn’t explain enough, but either way, the film introduced some grand ideas about creation, religion and where humanity fits in the scope of the vast universe of the film. There have been two big question marks about the film: what’s the deal with the strange opening sequence in which an Engineer drinks a mystery cup of tea (or whatever) and subsequently disintegrates? And secondly, what did humanity do to cause our creators to want to destroy to us? While this has led to many interesting theories and debates, Ridley Scott has gone ahead and ruined them for you, and as a result, taken some of the shine off “Prometheus” in the process.

So first, let’s get to that opening scene. “…[the] sequence at the beginning of the film that is fundamentally creation. It’s a donation, in the sense that the weight and the construction of the DNA of those aliens is way beyond what we can possibly imagine,” Scott said. Adding that the planet isn’t necessarily Earth, he says, “No, it doesn’t have to be. That could be anywhere. That could be a planet anywhere. All he’s doing is acting as a gardener in space. And the plant life, in fact, is the disintegration of himself. If you parallel that idea with other sacrificial elements in history – which are clearly illustrated with the Mayans and the Incas – he would live for one year as a prince, and at the end of that year, he would be taken and donated to the gods in hopes of improving what might happen next year, be it with crops or weather, et cetera.”

quote:
With that bit now nice and explained, let’s get to the bigger question — what did we do to make God/our creators angry? Well, if you theorized that it was because we crucified Jesus, you win! Confirming that at one point the script explicitly spelled this out, Scott says that was the direction they were taking with the story — at least at first. “We definitely did, and then we thought it was a little too on the nose,” he admits. “But if you look at it as an ‘our children are misbehaving down there’ scenario, there are moments where it looks like we’ve gone out of control, running around with armor and skirts, which of course would be the Roman Empire. And they were given a long run. A thousand years before their disintegration actually started to happen. And you can say, ‘Let’s send down one more of our emissaries to see if he can stop it.’ Guess what? They crucified him.”

So in short: Jesus was an Engineer, we fricked it up by killing him, our creators got mad and then hatched a really, really long and elaborate plan to kill us off.

Remember that Scientology and the Mormon faith are rumored to have fringe astrotheology at the root of their teachings...

The link below discusses this (Scientology link to UFO research) and the work of Tesla and the magik of Electromagnetism (the real prime mover in the universe, not gravity). This theme is at the core of many esoteric traditions...

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread976484/pg1