re: So when do we actually start giving O some credit?

quote:

---

Obviously you don’t know what record vs ranked opponents means

---

Well someone clearly stated 1-4 vs teams that were ranked at the end of the season so either you can’t read or you have an agenda to overinflate his record by counting an Ole Miss team that went 5-7 as ranked because the morons that vote in the AP had them 23 around halfway thru the season

quote:

---

or you didn’t like that Os is good so yo altered the definition to fit your agenda

---

Irony king strikes again! The only one with an agenda is you. You can claim beating an OM team that finished 5-7 or a Florida team that went 4-7 and fired their coach 2 weeks after we barely beat them was beating ranked teams but in the end you are only deluding yourself. Despite what you may think we all want LSU to win at a high level. You don’t get to the SECCG, the playoffs or access bowls by bragging about where teams were ranked when you played them. You get there by beating actual good teams, teams as in plural. So far, post Ole Miss O has only beat 2 actual good teams total, Stanford at USC and Auburn this year. So if you want to do better than 9-3 and the Citrus Bowl you are going to have to beat more than 1 team that FINISHES ranked where they are ranked when you play them isn’t really that important.

quote:

---

but outside of the Rantard bubble it isn’t reality.

---

Bro, it’s you that needs to step outside a bubble. Go find an article about the CFB playoffs where they discussed the resume of various teams. They clearly talk about CURRENT rankings, if they talk about rankings at the time they clearly mention it that way, like Auburn beat 2 teams that were ranked #1 or something like that. No one, except for Finebaum, gives Alabama credit for beating a top 3 team in Florida St