Started By
Message

re: why do conference championships matter in the CFP discussion????

Posted on 11/29/17 at 11:31 pm to
Posted by HarbaughsCameraMan
Member since Nov 2017
284 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 11:31 pm to
ESPN is stupid. Fans want to see good, fair competition, new matchups, not ones that were already decided.

I was a strong opponent to 1 vs 2 rematch talks of M-OSU in 2006.

Rematches in college football are lame. That's why the sport is so great. Stakes are so high every game.

If Bama backdoors in and Auburn has to play them again I don't care what happens, in my book Auburn wins the game becaus they already beat Bama and Bama didn't belong in the playoff to begin with.

I still consider LSU the rightful 2011 BCS National Champs. Alabama is the 2011 bullshite Crock of shite National Champs.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35629 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 11:41 pm to
Well every defender says 21-0.

So what? Alabama scored 6 points in the first game.

Why is the second game more important than the first game?

And in what universe in a playoff do you have to beat the same team twice while the loser only has to beat you once?

What the frick kind of playoff system is that?

College football went full sell-out ESPN retard fixed in 2011 and it burned them badly.

Nobody tuned in to watch the game but the two fanbases.

It's the biggest fraud title of the modern era along with Colorado's 5th down and Alabama's 1978 claimed title.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram