Started By
Message

re: 10 and 3 season is very attainable

Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Miles refusal to adapt the O is why he is gone plain and simple.


Only in so far as it effected the record.

At the end of the day, the issue for any coach (and for any fan with at least half a brain) is the final win-loss record. As such, Miles was fired because his averaging 10 wins a season was no longer seen as good enough at LSU given the resources available, both in terms of financial and infrastructure and in terms of players. 5 straight to BAMA and our former coach was additional icing on the cake.

But...and here's the good point...were it not for a handful of small missed opportunities, many of which were defensive in regards to losses to BAMA, Miles and his 1970's inept offense WOULD STILL BE HERE and he'd be here because he'd have more hardware because of more wins. That shitty offense was THIS CLOSE to handing LSU many more wins.

Because at the end of the day, only a fricking idiot isn't happy about winning if the winning isn't done in a way that is the most entertaining.
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24558 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

But...and here's the good point...were it not for a handful of small missed opportunities, many of which were defensive in regards to losses to BAMA, Miles and his 1970's inept offense WOULD STILL BE HERE and he'd be here because he'd have more hardware because of more wins.


Yep

Also:

If he or his offensive staff could have developed a QB during their careers at LSU he would have won more and still be at LSU.

If he could look at a clock and actually understand what all the numbers mean in relation to a football game he would have won more games and still be at LSU. Example: his last game as the LSU coach.

If he did, maybe if he didn't meddle with the offensive plays during games he would have won more games and still be at LSU.

If would have remained the Mad-Hatter or Lestitcles instead of going into a conservative shell his last few years he would have won more games and still be at LSU.
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24558 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Because at the end of the day, only a fricking idiot isn't happy about winning if the winning isn't done in a way that is the most entertaining.


You haven't been on the Tiger Rant at all this year have you? Or are you calling the Rantards idiots?

Some of the very people in this thread have probably been bitching about LSU's wins this year. In case you haven't read UF and Auburn are both very overrated. LSU didn't win those games or the others, the losing teams lost them in spite of LSU and the head coach.

----------------------------------

Back to your post:

But, it wasn't about the winning it was about the losing games with time running out, losing games to team's who didn't score one TD the whole game, it was about promising to open up the offense and then coming out with the same prehistoric shite as before. Etc, etc, etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram