Started By
Message

re: AG Sessions Refuses to lift Gag Order of Uranium Scandal Witness

Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Unless it's for national security reasons, then transparency would be a start.
Isn't it potentially a part of an ongoing investigation? Why does this guy have to run his mouth about what he does or doesn't know. Don't you people have enough to run around squawking about?

No offense.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Don't you people have enough to run around squawking about?


What do you mean, you people? Huh?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36458 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Isn't it potentially a part of an ongoing investigation? 

So why not interview him or take his testimony? In an investigation, you want to be as thorough as possible. Limiting the testimony of potential witnesses decreases the likelihood of an effective investigation.
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Isn't it potentially a part of an ongoing investigation? Why does this guy have to run his mouth about what he does or doesn't know. Don't you people have enough to run around squawking about?




Well I'll be damned, that Cornell education has paid off.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram