re: McClure: After research I have been told altercation between O/Canada did not happen.

quote:

---

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the reason Canada's offense is a disaster is because O has his hands all in it? I mean he did admit to doing it so who's to say he hasn't been meddling all along? I would be willing to bet that if O were fired today the team would beat everyone but Alabama and maybe Auburn.

---

Here's what pisses me off:

I've been watching an offense that shows some bright spots, some marginal improvement, and isn't really "bad". Just bad in areas (such as 3rd downs) or a times (2nd qtrs?).

What would the REAL Canadian offense have been doing. Would the line have had some advantages with scheming? Would the running game have been more productive? What would 3rd downs look like?

Guess what, Miles got fired for thinking "good enough is good enough". I don't need to change the offense, it's worked just fine in the past. We should be MAXIMIZING advantages. Not giving them up because we're scared they may not be able to execute Canada's very well. Guess what, they're not executing the Miles/Ensminger offense worth a frick.

Let the man do his job. If you're pleasantly surprised- fricking great. If it's a disaster? So fricking what. It already is. You lost to troy going scoreless for the entire first half.