- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newsweek attacks Mark Dice
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:11 pm to Parmen
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:11 pm to Parmen
If we can get debate of Eichenwald v. Dice, it would be a great match up highlighting the terrible, faux outaged, attention-seeking, neophytes relying on emotional appeals of the left v. right.
Then we could have the debate of Harris v. Shapiro immediately follow, and we would how great match-up of highlighting the great, rational, topic-based, polymaths relying on their evidence-based logical conclusions of the left v. right.
Both would be entertaining match-ups, and hopefully show that both sides can be terrible and both sides can be great, so people can see that we should stop valuing the emotional opinions of the terrible of both to start considering the evidence-based reasoning of the great.
Then we could have the debate of Harris v. Shapiro immediately follow, and we would how great match-up of highlighting the great, rational, topic-based, polymaths relying on their evidence-based logical conclusions of the left v. right.
Both would be entertaining match-ups, and hopefully show that both sides can be terrible and both sides can be great, so people can see that we should stop valuing the emotional opinions of the terrible of both to start considering the evidence-based reasoning of the great.
2
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:51 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
If we can get debate of Eichenwald v. Dice, it would be a great match up highlighting the terrible, faux outaged, attention-seeking, neophytes relying on emotional appeals of the left v. right.
Then we could have the debate of Harris v. Shapiro immediately follow, and we would how great match-up of highlighting the great, rational, topic-based, polymaths relying on their evidence-based logical conclusions of the left v. right.
Both would be entertaining match-ups, and hopefully show that both sides can be terrible and both sides can be great, so people can see that we should stop valuing the emotional opinions of the terrible of both to start considering the evidence-based reasoning of the great.
You are so very correct, and that is a great example of polar opposites in the debate for mindshare. People like Parmen who fall down and slobber the knob of drones like Mark Dick just perpetuate the stupidity of emotion-based argument.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News