- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jacoby Stevens Moving to F Back
Posted on 9/27/17 at 12:17 pm to LF7
Posted on 9/27/17 at 12:17 pm to LF7
quote:
Receivers are Z and X correct
In traditional 2 WR, 1 TE, and 2 back sets (old school "pro" formation), yes. X (traditionally the split end "SE") and Z (traditionally the flanker "F") are the wide outs - in the pro-set era of the '70s and early '80s, you might have seen the TE referred to as "Y" - but Y has largely been reserved for the slot receiver in a 3 WR formation.
I wouldn't get too wrapped around F-back or H-back designations - any scheme that uses these are generally flexible and you're setting yourself up for confusion if you say anything like:
quote:
F is always the inner most receiver, no matter if it's two wide or three wide.
All an H-back or F-back is, simply, a TE that lines up in the backfield, or conversely a running back/fullback that motions and lines up outside the tackle box as a receiver - just to differentiate these players from a slot or Y receiver.
And if you're using lots of motion, there's no telling where that cat ends up - and if he's outside, that doesn't magically make him something he's not. He's still an H-back/F-back.
This post was edited on 9/27/17 at 12:21 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News