Started By
Message

re: Jacoby Stevens Moving to F Back

Posted on 9/27/17 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89765 posts
Posted on 9/27/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Receivers are Z and X correct


In traditional 2 WR, 1 TE, and 2 back sets (old school "pro" formation), yes. X (traditionally the split end "SE") and Z (traditionally the flanker "F") are the wide outs - in the pro-set era of the '70s and early '80s, you might have seen the TE referred to as "Y" - but Y has largely been reserved for the slot receiver in a 3 WR formation.

I wouldn't get too wrapped around F-back or H-back designations - any scheme that uses these are generally flexible and you're setting yourself up for confusion if you say anything like:

quote:

F is always the inner most receiver, no matter if it's two wide or three wide.


All an H-back or F-back is, simply, a TE that lines up in the backfield, or conversely a running back/fullback that motions and lines up outside the tackle box as a receiver - just to differentiate these players from a slot or Y receiver.

And if you're using lots of motion, there's no telling where that cat ends up - and if he's outside, that doesn't magically make him something he's not. He's still an H-back/F-back.
This post was edited on 9/27/17 at 12:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram