- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Canada to Orgeron: we need to simplify
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:23 pm to I20goon
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:23 pm to I20goon
quote:
Other than determining it it's zone vs man-man coverage, the motion is about eyes and keys. If we overload a side, the keys change, the eyes change. Secondly, the LACK OF REACTION pre-snap allows for mismatches later in the game. 2 tackles overload... 2 tackles overload... ooops, that's a TE.
All of those benefits yet we are still worse than we've been in some time. Perhaps we should focus on getting some of the basics shored up before we worry about pre-snap motions.
1
Posted on 9/25/17 at 2:34 pm to slackster
quote:I really can't argue that. It makes sense.
All of those benefits yet we are still worse than we've been in some time. Perhaps we should focus on getting some of the basics shored up before we worry about pre-snap motions.
However, if I were going to argue against your point I would say we haven't had a single fumble on a motion exchange, an inadvertent collision in the backfield, and very few illegal motion/illegal procedure penalties. Nor have WRs (or Tackles) been dropping from exhaustion or cramps.
I don't see the negatives. Our offensive problems do not stem from making people run 18' at a leisurely pace.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News