re: Are you happy your tax dollar subsidize the Saints and the NFL??

quote:

---

You have yet to present one piece of evidence this is the case.

---

Dude. You fricking started the thread and haven't presented any evidence supporting the idea that it isn't a net gain.

Good fricking lord.

quote:

---

BUT you still miss the point that return to the government should not be a criteria for taxes!!!!

---

I'm not even entirely sure what you mean with this sentence. Criteria how?

quote:

---

They could take ALL your money and give to Benson and get back all your money plus something and in your eyes that is a good thing. That is "keeping a business that cost less than X" and you want to "frickin keep it".

---

Oh. Now I see. You still haven't the slightest idea how this thing happens.

You don't even understand the mechanism.

But, that's beside the point. My ENTIRE response was simply based on two simple points.

1)I asked. "Is there evidence this is a net loser"? - I've received no answer

and

2)I've pointed out that if it is NOT a net loser, then that means that no taxpayer dollars are "taken". To this, you don't even seem to understand the math.

But hell. Can we at least get #1 out of the way? How on Earth can you be bent out of shape about something you don't even KNOW to be true and take zero effort to actually check to see if it is?

That's just fricking weird.