- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are you happy your tax dollar subsidize the Saints and the NFL??
Posted on 9/12/17 at 5:37 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 9/12/17 at 5:37 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The state never has to take the $1000.
They don't have too but they do. They spend it.
I would rather they simply let me keep the $1000 and never have the $1100 from the Saints either.
(I know you are not saying yes or no on whether the Saints are a net positive but if the Saints are indeed a net positive for the state then why do they need our money? Why can't we just say you nor your employees don't have to pay taxes Saints instead of giving them money?)
You assume the state government doesn't waste the extra revenue. They are in fact redistributing income. Have they ever, EVER, said we are going to take profits from the hotel tax, for example, they put into place to help finance the Saints and give a tax rebate to the hotel guest that paid it?
How much should your Saints tax be? and what should the state do with the return they get on you Saints tax?
How many more businesses should the state invest in?
Posted on 9/12/17 at 5:42 pm to I B Freeman
quote:Dear fricking God. Dude. Obviously, you don't realize it. But this thread is really bad for you.
They don't have too but they do. They spend it.
Come on.
quote:I assume no such thing. It's just entirely irrelevant to the point.
You assume the state government doesn't waste the extra revenue. They are in fact redistributing income. Have they ever, EVER, said we are going to take profits from the hotel tax, for example, they put into place to help finance the Saints and give a tax rebate to the hotel guest that paid it?
You're making it harder than it is.
The state in any given year will spend X.
If the state does anything with that X that results in X+Y, then the amount required of the state from its citizens is X-Y.
All the time. 100% of the time. No exceptions.
quote:Generally speaking, I think government choosing winners and losers is a bad proposition. In fact, I think that like 99.9% of the time. So more than generally speaking.
How many more businesses should the state invest in?
But, you can't be pathological about it. If losing a business would cost X dollars for the state and keeping it would cost LESS than X, you fricking keep it.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)