Started By
Message

re: Only a few cities could actually accommodate Amazon's second HQ

Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:00 am to
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:00 am to
If I am Amazon it would be Dallas or Nashville or Boston.

Atlanta's airport is big and busy but it is sort of an hinderance IMHO because it is so busy. Atlanta needs another airport to catch up with Dallas, Houston and Northeastern major cities. There just is no way to get in and out of Jackson Hartsfield quickly. I would not want my employees spending hours and hours parking and getting through the airport and waiting for delayed flights. A thunderstorm over ATL means hours of delays for thousands of people--more so than any other airport simply because of the number of flights coming and going. A second airport in Cobb county would help tremendously.

The other thing that factors in these deals that many people overlook is the taxes on the management's salary. A guy making several hundred thousand dollars year can't help but think of what a location will cost him personally. A Texas or Tennessee location would save him tens of thousands of dollars a year in personal income tax.

Boston has high taxes but it would be a great place to recruit and has good infrastructure.

Nashville has no personal income taxes, a good airport that has all the major airlines--they would simply add international flights as demand increases. The airport is not so large that hours are spent navigating the terminal.

Dallas is a world class city. The addition of Amazon would hardly tax the resources already in place in the metroplex.
This post was edited on 9/9/17 at 9:29 am
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12710 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:05 am to
Detroit is the dark horse. Boston is too similar to Seattle and tax high state. Nashville probably best bet
Posted by bostitch
Member since Apr 2016
561 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:15 am to
Doubt it would be Dallas. Austin, maybe, but Dallas probably not. Decision makers high up in Amazon care more about liberal politics than sound business. So long as the impact isn't that bad to the bottom line they would rather hitch their wagon to a "progressive" city. They'll find a way to make the math show them it's the right decision when in reality they're just jerking themselves off.

Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64396 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 12:09 pm to
Amazon already has a zillion terabytes of cloud storage, processing, and bandwidth in "data center alley" in Ashburn VA (DC suburb) at the MAE east cloud exchange. Makes no sense for them to relocate there, they already are there.

Dallas and Atlanta both make sense.

Not taking anything away from Dallas, but Atlanta is the better hub for global fiber networks, real estate is cheaper, Google already has a few million square feet for a reason here, if I were a betting man it would be Atlanta.

Dallas is a close second.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram