Started By
Message

re: Have we discussed Daily Stormer and Stormfront getting banned from the internet?

Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:03 pm to
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

There's a difference between that and hate speech.


From what I understand in order for advocating violence to be a crime the violence must be "imminent" ... i.e. I can type on here "we should all go and have a riot downtown"...no crime committed.

But, if I am downtown and shouting through a megaphone "burn this motherfricker down, smash up the stores" (or whatever you'd say to incite a riot )...then that's a crime.

With that in mind, I'd be curious as to what was written on those websites that was used as an excuse to have them taken down. If it wasn't something severely egregious then this is a terribly slippery slope we've started down.

ETA: Just read a little further and saw it was the ISP that booted them. Whelp, in that case DS should sue just like the gay wedding cake people.
This post was edited on 9/3/17 at 2:07 pm
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

From what I understand in order for advocating violence to be a crime the violence must be "imminent" ... i.e. I can type on here "we should all go and have a riot downtown"...no crime committed. 

But, if I am downtown and shouting through a megaphone "burn this motherfricker down, smash up the stores" (or whatever you'd say to incite a riot ? )...then that's a crime. 


Yep that's Brandenburg v. Ohio.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram