Started By
Message

re: $99 for a case of water: Texas officials report price gouging post-Harvey

Posted on 9/1/17 at 10:09 am to
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I understand your principle, and agree with it. But no one is going to rush into a flooded area to sell cases of water and gasoline. You can't just open a convenience store on a whim in the middle of a natural disaster.





You don't need a convenience store to sell water or food.You don't need a gas station and pump infrastructure in place to transport gasoline with trucks capable of distributing gasoline for sale. People are already flooding the area to provide relief at no financial benefit to them. A financial benefit is the only incentive the market can offer. If there's a better incentive, let me know.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70972 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

You don't need a gas station and pump infrastructure in place to transport gasoline with trucks capable of distributing gasoline for sale.


Trucks can not nor should not distribute gasoline. This is a major risk concern, and would undoubtedly not be covered by your commercial insurance policy in the event you have a spill while attempting to sell without proper risk management measures in place. This is an unrealistic scenario.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45897 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 10:14 am to
I wonder which is worse? The guy selling a case of water for $100 in a disaster zone that he purchased for $4 or the guy that pops him in the arse who only has $10 and four kids that are dehydrating?

I'd want to be on the jury for the guy that pulled the trigger. "Not guilty"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram