- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Don't take the Bible literally says scholar who brought earliest Latin analysis of Gospels
Posted on 8/27/17 at 11:15 pm to Bench McElroy
Posted on 8/27/17 at 11:15 pm to Bench McElroy
I went to Catholic school in middle school. I am pretty sure we were taught that that old testament were parables...
The time between Jesus's apparent death and when the bible was written was several hundred years. So between that time and translating it, I doubt it was 100% accurate. Then the bible is a collection of writing that were picked to be published so what did the other stuff say?
Why would anyone take it literal?
The time between Jesus's apparent death and when the bible was written was several hundred years. So between that time and translating it, I doubt it was 100% accurate. Then the bible is a collection of writing that were picked to be published so what did the other stuff say?
Why would anyone take it literal?
1
Posted on 8/27/17 at 11:34 pm to OweO
quote:
The time between Jesus's apparent death and when the bible was written was several hundred years.
The Old Testament books were written down long before Jesus. The Gospels were written shortly after Jesus, and Paul wrote most of the other New Testament books in the decades after Jesus. The Bible wasn't assembled into one big book for a long time, but the individual books were all written.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News