Started By
Message

re: If secession was legal then what right did the North have to keep the South in the USA?

Posted on 8/18/17 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by Guidge
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
556 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 12:02 pm to
Let me give you the real answer. 1) FIRST, the war was absolutely fought over slavery. Read South Carolina "Reasons for secession", they are almost exclusively regarding slavery. They fought for states' rights, but states' rights to own and manage slaves.

prior to the civil war, each state signed a pact with the Federal Government. The federal end of it stated it must uphold state laws and other stuff. South Carolina, the first state to secede, that the US government broke the pact by not forcing other non slave holding states (the north) to return runaway slaves. The US government claimed it couldn't uphold one states laws that broke another's. The us government also stated that it was constitutional to use military power to end rebellions.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124527 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

If secession was legal then what right did the North have to keep the South in the USA?
quote:

FIRST, the war was absolutely fought over slavery.
Nonresponsive to the question.

Was secession legal?

If so, what right did the North have to keep the South in the USA?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram