Started By
Message

re: Why aren't these conservative geniuses talking about repealing the 17th?

Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:27 am to
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19508 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:27 am to
quote:

The people who get appointed would be the biggest arse kissers and schmoozers of their respective parties or, perhaps in some cases, "elder statesmen" getting one last gig in.


It would shift politics back to the states and local districts instead of D.C. It's easier to elect a "radical" to be a state representative than it is for one to win a statewide election. That in turns means that people who wanted to buck the system would have an incentive to run for a state rep position helping keep the establishment from running roughshod over everyone else.

A much better argument against repealing the 17th is that would you really want corrupt legislators in states like Illinois directly choosing who represents their state in D.C. I don't think it's a particularly good argument but it's much better than your argument that repealing the 17th would result in only the establishment being in power.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram