Started By
Message

re: Norm MacDonald says that he's not completely sure that OJ is guilty of murder

Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109409 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

I always suspected OJ was covering for his son. The son had a history of violence just like dear old dad.


Dear old dad has the cops called on him 10 fricking times for assaulting his wife, raped her for letting a gay man kiss her son, and had highly confrontational reactions towards her suitors.

quote:

And we will never know what was inside the envelope OJ gave the Judge that was only to be opened in case he was convicted.


What are you talking about?

quote:

That envelope had a few things inside, one could have been a knife from the shape/size of impression it left on the envelope.


Why would he hand the knife to a judge and have it in a sealed envelope? Did the prosecution not know about any of this? How did he get the murder weapon to a judge in a sealed envelope and why wasn't this used by the defense or prosecution?

In addition, are you fricking insane?

quote:

It is conceivable OJ was willing to stand trial for a loved one, but not willing to actually take the fall and the envelope held the real evidence of who did the killing.


Taking OJ Simpson into context as a human being, no it is not conceivable that he would take the fall for his children. He is a horrible person who threw everyone under the bus no matter what when it benefitted him. He would have without any reasonable doubt thrown Jason under the bus if there was an actual case.

What he's done and said to his later two children is proof of this. He's been maliciously cruel towards them and told them bold faced horrible lies. OJ only sees people as projections of himself, and if they don't meet his standards, then they need to be demeaned or killed. He's a monstrous human being that has almost singlehandedly ruined this country.

If you're still on this theory, I encourage you to watch the 9 hour OJ 30 for 30. Once you watch it, a simple "I am sorry and I am an idiot" will suffice as an apology.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17313 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:21 pm to
quote:


Why would he hand the knife to a judge and have it in a sealed envelope? Did the prosecution not know about any of this? How did he get the murder weapon to a judge in a sealed envelope and why wasn't this used by the defense or prosecution?

In addition, are you fricking insane?



NY Times July 1 1994

" LOS ANGELES, July 1— The mystery of the O. J. Simpson case deepened today when the presiding judge refused to open a bulky manila produced earlier in the day by Mr. Simpson's chief lawyer, Robert L. Shapiro.

The judge, Kathleen Kennedy-Powell of Municipal Court, presiding over the preliminary hearing, interrupted testimony to announce that she had received a sealed envelope of evidence from the defense.

I do not know what is in that envelope," the judge said. "This is a novel situation for this court. I know it's a novel situation for me."

She said that all she could say about the envelope was that a retired judge of the Superior Court, Delbert Wong, acting as a special master, had "recovered whatever that item is."

"Where and when or what it is, I do not know," Judge Kennedy-Powell said.

The judge said it would be at least a week before she would decide whether to open the envelope.

Mr. Shapiro asked that the envelope remain sealed but offered no explanation of its contents. "It is evidence that is in possession of the defense and that we have no obligation to disclose," Mr. Shapiro said. "


NY Times Jan 25 1995

" LOS ANGELES, Jan. 25— A manila envelope that has been a mysterious part of the O. J. Simpson case since last July surfaced prominently today during opening statements by the defense, but the contents remained a mystery.

Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., the lawyer who is giving the opening statement for Mr. Simpson, interrupted a recitation of defense exhibits by calling for a colleague to bring him something. It was the envelope.

William Hodgmen, a deputy district attorney, apparently fearing what was about to happen, rose to object. After a private conference with Judge Lance A. Ito, Mr. Cochran agreed to put the envelope aside and continued his remarks. "
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 9:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram