Started By
Message

re: How is Slade Bolden not a top priority for this class?

Posted on 7/21/17 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by GratefulTiger
Member since Dec 2003
1567 posts
Posted on 7/21/17 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Provens is better.


Agree. Love his tape, can cut on a dime. His first step isn't elite nor does he have breakaway speed, but everything in between is great. Needs to learn how to find better lanes, not hard to fix. To any doubters, watch his highlights and look at his feet. I say he is a more productive Blue.

Edit: nothing like getting DV'd explaining why I'm excited about one of our commits. Never suprised
This post was edited on 7/22/17 at 12:51 am
Posted by Ron Nobles
Member since Jul 2017
106 posts
Posted on 7/21/17 at 1:45 pm to
Id take Slade's athletism, intelligence, and competitive drive any day.
Posted by ExpoTiger
Member since Jul 2014
6513 posts
Posted on 7/22/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

I say he is a more productive Blue.

lol I swear the things people say here. You think Bolden is a more productive back than Blue? Productive as in he would get more touches or you think given the same number of touches, bolden would be more productive? Cuz a more productive player equals a better player. Anyway you shake it. Blue has started and performed well in the NFL. Are you telling me that In Bolden's tape You see a starting NFL back? I do not see quote that potential when I see his tape. Finevplayer and all but the perspective goes right out the window on this board everyday in every thread.

Edit- I get that production doesn't always equate to one guy being better especially when watching college ball Example- There's an argument to be made as to whether guice is a better back than Leonard. Both great. Different backs.
This post was edited on 7/22/17 at 11:01 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram