Started By
Message

re: Marco Rubio on Net Neutrality: ‘This Is a Solution in Search of a Problem’

Posted on 7/13/17 at 11:03 am to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28731 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 11:03 am to
quote:

That's an indicator that the delivery of your content has tangible economic value. Value, the deliverer is banned for charging for.
quote:

Nope. It's a "market" where some participants provide value to others for free by mandate. A "free market" doesn't mean some people are forced to work for no pay.
This is always your argument, as if the ISPs have to provide services for free. They get paid for their services. Always have, always will. What you want is for them to be able to charge the sender and the receiver for the same thing. This is like if I were to send a package, and the shipper and I agree on a price for the service. I hold up my end of the deal and pay them, and their end is to deliver the package. That's their fricking job. But then they arrive at the destination and see that the receiver is doing quite well, and they open my package to see that what is inside is quite valuable, they then decide they need more money than the agreed upon amount.

That's what you want ISPs to have the power to do, and it's fricked up.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57439 posts
Posted on 7/13/17 at 11:29 am to
quote:

This is always your argument
Yes. I'm consistent.

quote:

as if the ISPs have to provide services for free. They get paid for their services.
They don't. Netflix traffic has far more economic value than Ted Smith's Krackpot Konspiracy Blog. By definition NN demands that the ISP's pricing does NOT reflect that difference in value.

quote:

What you want is for them to be able to charge the sender and the receiver for the same thing.
Not exactly. In most cases they aren't the same provider. And both ends of the transaction have value. One is access and one is delivery.

Why does Walmart get a markup? In most cases the products on their shelves are there because the vendor paid for the shelf space. Shouldn't they deliver Kraft mac-and-cheese for the same price they pay for it, since Kraft already paid to put it on the shelf?

Of course not-- because delivering a product to a customer has value. Amazon does the same thing. And they charge for it (both seller and buyer) only without even providing the shelf space in many cases.

quote:

That's what you want ISPs to have the power to do, and it's fricked up.
We'll have to disagree. I think if you deliver of something of value, you should have the opportunity to be paid for that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram