Started By
Message

re: Bible Prophesy Interpretation vs Literal Word

Posted on 6/30/17 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39354 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

but absolutely ZERO evidence for a worldwide flood.

The problem here is people today assume the people who wrote the Bible understand the world as we do today. They knew nothing of North and South America. For them, the middle east and Europe was the world. When they talk about a worldwide flood they're not talking about Brazil or Canada.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116640 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

The problem here is people today assume the people who wrote the Bible understand the world as we do today. They knew nothing of North and South America. For them, the middle east and Europe was the world. When they talk about a worldwide flood they're not talking about Brazil or Canada.


That's fine. That story was written by barely literate desert nomads (at best).

It is when modern day conservative american Christians try to spin it as the LITERAL WORD with no understanding of science, history, context, translation, etc.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98573 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

The problem here is people today assume the people who wrote the Bible understand the world as we do today. They knew nothing of North and South America. For them, the middle east and Europe was the world. When they talk about a worldwide flood they're not talking about Brazil or Canada.


By the time of the New Testament, India and China were known to the Roman world, and there was intermittent trade. Some postulate that early Christian thinking was influenced by Buddhist philosophy.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram