re: .

Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:31 pm to Insert clever name

Posted by dukke v

PLUTO

Member since Jul 2006

203801 posts

Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:31 pm to Insert clever name

quote:
That doesn't work because you are looking at their result before the season finished You are discounting their Rose Bowl loss and trying to compare them to teams who played an entire season

They did play an entire season... They finished 11-1... They were undefeated before the rose Bowl... The thread is about some of the best teams to NOT win A championship... I just threw the 1971 Michigan team out there... They have plenty of examples....

EVERYONE who is in their 30's or younger ALL say the 2007 PATS... Here is my problem... There are so many young people that think STATS are ALL that matter in ANY sport...

SORRY that's just not the case... There are plenty of factors that effect EVERY TEAM at any time... And YES sometimes the elements and such make A team have A bad day... shite happens.. its sports....

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Insert clever name

Member since Jun 2017

104 posts

Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:37 pm to dukke v

I actually think the 2011 Green Bay Packers was a better team
I am over 30 slightly at 34 but that team was coming off a Super Bowl championship and started 13-0 or something maybe 14-0

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by StrongBackWeakMind

Member since May 2014

22650 posts

Posted on 6/21/17 at 6:37 pm to dukke v

The 2007 Pats get mentioned so much because of the difficulty of what they did. You don't need to resort to stats to show how good they were.

Only two NFL teams have gone undefeated in the regular season since the 1930s. CFB teams go undefeated in the regular season all the time.

This post was edited on 6/21/17 at 6:38 pm

1 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board