Started By
Message

re: Why is it Okay to Talk About Trump/Russia w/No Evidence, but Seth Rich is not ok?

Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:31 am to
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14145 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:31 am to
If you can't see the evidentiary difference between these two examples, then all I can say is - good grief.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
28579 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 4:25 pm to
I will make any bet with anyone that nothing will come of either of these things.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:29 am to
quote:

If you can't see the evidentiary difference between these two examples, then all I can say is - good grief.


Give me 5 solid pieces of evidence that suggest the Trump campaign broke the law in regards to Russia and the election.

Hell, I'll make it easier on you and allow you to go beyond just what is legal and what is not. Give me my 5 pieces of evidence that suggest that someone within the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russia on the election

As for the Seth Rich murder, as a former investigator I can tell you , the investigation should be in the FBI's hands, because as an investigator you never accept a coincidence at face value.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram