Started By
Message

re: Anybody Else Bothered by Mrs. Gingrich as Ambassador to the Vatican

Posted on 5/23/17 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19600 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 12:46 pm to
If the Vatican had any morals they would refuse to accept her (there is no requirement that the receiving country accept any ambassador).

But if they give enough $$$ then that's all that matters to them (or, sadly, to many churches and denominations today).
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19600 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

She was a gold-digging and adulterous slut who was banging Newt when his wife was sick with cancer


Slut Newt did so much dirty deeds everything is confused.

He was cheating with wife #2 while wife #1 was dying of cancer (and he served the papers while she was in the hospital).

Callista and Newt were doing the deed while wife #2 had MS (and refused to agree to an open marriage).

And the first two marriages were around 18 years, and Callista and Newt are coming up on 17. She may want to watch out, shall we say.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 12:50 pm
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
19535 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 2:04 pm to
If you look at where she and Newt appear to be in their faith life today it makes a lot of sense. From all indications they are practicing Catholics in good standing. Newt has even voiced a couple of books on the Catholic faith.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
102212 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 2:07 pm to
Personally, I would have found an atheist to do it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram