Started By
Message

re: Robert E. Lee has been misrepresented by regressive "historians"

Posted on 5/22/17 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by JonTigerFan11
Member since May 2016
870 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 5:11 pm to
It is absurd to me that people have been taught that the Civil War was fought because of slavery. Abraham Lincoln consistently said that the reason for the war was to preserve the Union. Whether slaves were free or not. He was voted in as a neutral candidate because he wasn't an opponent or proponent of slavery. The South seceded because they believed the people in Washington did not have their best interests in mind. It just so happened that the South was agricultural, so keeping slaves was important for them to sustain their economy. The slaves were freed in order to give the war a purpose as it grew more violent than those in charge predicted. Lincoln ingeniously also recognized that England and France could not justify helping a country that was "fighting for slavery" which effectively damned the South economically. To the soldiers who fought in the war, their State was effectively their country. Lee was not going to turn against his state and his family to preserve a fragile union. So he fought for his state and named his army The Army of Northern Virginia.
Posted by basiletiger
lafayette, la.
Member since Aug 2007
2144 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 5:19 pm to
Some of ya'll need a little history lesson so I'm going to help you out.

1. Robert E. Lee did IN FACT, own slaves. Yes, he eventually emancipated his father in laws slaves, but only after he used them, for years, to his financial advantage.
2. According to Lee himself ""The painful discipline they are undergoing is necessary for their instruction as a race... How long their subjugation may be necessary is known and ordered by a wise Merciful Providence," He was talking about slavery being necessary for african american's so that they could become civilized...like they were animals...
3. He killed more americans than any opposing general in U. S. History.
4. He 100% supported the succession of the southern states from the country you now live in.
5. He fought as a confederate general to wholeheartedly defend the right to own slaves.
6. The Liberty Place obelisk that was removed was the rallying ground for David Duke. Yes, that David Duke (ya know, with the KKK)
7. If I see one more post asking for the removal of a Martin Luther king Jr. statue because New Orleans chose to remove statues that represent HATE to many people (even white people....) I am going to scream. silently. But still.
8. For those of you who don't know, MLK Jr. believed in the equality of ALL people regardless of their race or gender. He was probably one of the least hateful, least prejudice people to walk the planet. His message was love. And some of ya'll need some love apparently.
Please stop believing everything you read on Facebook and read some nonfiction.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

It is absurd to me that people have been taught that the Civil War was fought because of slavery.


The southern states, most especially those in the Deep South, seceded primarily over the question of slavery.

quote:

Abraham Lincoln consistently said that the reason for the war was to preserve the Union.


And then his tune started changing in 1862. But apparently we only want to take into account words he said while trying to woo the South back into the Union. By 1863-64, the war had taken on a whole new meaning.

quote:

He was voted in as a neutral candidate because he wasn't an opponent or proponent of slavery.


Not true. He was very much opposed to the expansion of slavery into the territories and wouldn't have been sad to see the institution disappear from America entirely.

quote:

The South seceded because they believed the people in Washington did not have their best interests in mind.


I.E. slavery.

quote:

It just so happened that the South was agricultural, so keeping slaves was important for them to sustain their economy.


Yeah...and it just so happens had the South never had slaves, they never secede from the Union in the first place.



This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 5:24 pm
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29272 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It is absurd to me that people have been taught that the Civil War was fought because of slavery.


read the declarations of secession from each state. it's pretty clear as to why each state decided to leave.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram