- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Robert E. Lee has been misrepresented by regressive "historians"
Posted on 5/22/17 at 4:13 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Posted on 5/22/17 at 4:13 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
They should have been able to maintain a strategic and operational defense. Float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. But Lee had to attack anything he saw - even Fort Stedman at the very end of his personal misadventure.
The south should have disbanded its armies and fought as an unconventional insurgency, but then again, they should have also freed the slaves and tried the slave owners for enslaving other humans.
Lee isn't my hero by any means, but I don't think he was a tactical slouch either. The guy basically knew the north would outlast given an modest battle tempo, and I think he and others believed they could win a few decisive victories and then the Union would come to the table.
That was of course, wrong.
This post was edited on 5/22/17 at 4:14 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News