- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They killed him
Posted on 5/20/17 at 7:53 am to Wolfhound45
Posted on 5/20/17 at 7:53 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Law enforcement officials have said that Rich’s computer and email activity have been examined and suggest nothing that would connect him to WikiLeaks — which, 12 days after Rich’s death, published 20,000 emails that embarrassed former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and the DNC, and forced the ouster of its chairwoman.
Because they are investigating the unusual circumstances under which a DNC staffer was murdered? Good investigators cover all bases.
First the meme was to ask why they didn't investigate the laptop. Then the meme becomes that there must be some reason they did as if that validates the conspiracy theory.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:04 am to GFaceKillah
But it was a botched robbery. All of the physical evidence was at the crime scene.
Open and shut case
Open and shut case
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:11 am to GFaceKillah
Killah, you're trying hard brah. I'll give you that much and props for standing your ground.
However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.
They killed that boy to shut him up and for what he knew. The prosecution angle just doesn't hold water for ONE reason.
Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?
Obvious reason #2, in ANY other circumstance the DNC would have been screaming from the mountain top about Seth being killed in an upscale neighborhood with a gun. If someone isn't safe there from the evils of firearms, where would they be safe. Instead, they run from the Rich story like it has AIDS.
Gun ain't got no bullets baw.
However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.
They killed that boy to shut him up and for what he knew. The prosecution angle just doesn't hold water for ONE reason.
Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?
Obvious reason #2, in ANY other circumstance the DNC would have been screaming from the mountain top about Seth being killed in an upscale neighborhood with a gun. If someone isn't safe there from the evils of firearms, where would they be safe. Instead, they run from the Rich story like it has AIDS.
Gun ain't got no bullets baw.
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:17 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News