Except for the fact in the "last" one, chronologically it's the first one....And you can't see if he has the ball yet. No one doubts he touched the bag at some point, we are doubtful he stayed in contact when the throw pulled him off.

Changed those pics around and you have proof positive he wasn't on the bag.

Question being, when did he have the ball in possession

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by BEATbama05

Benton, LA

Member since Oct 2008

682 posts

Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:05 am to the LSUSaint

quote:
Except for the fact in the "last" one, chronologically it's the first one....And you can't see if he has the ball yet. No one doubts he touched the bag at some point, we are doubtful he stayed in contact when the throw pulled him off. Changed those pics around and you have proof positive he wasn't on the bag. Question being, when did he have the ball in possession

You're over thinking this. The shadow gap isn't covered up until after the runner has touched the bag. It doesn't matter when the ball makes it into his glove since the argument and call was that the 1st basemen pulled off the bag. The only exception would be of course if he caught it and then pulled off, but I don't think this was ever in debate.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by magiLSU

Prairieville

Member since Jan 2004

2356 posts

Posted on 5/8/17 at 10:05 am to the LSUSaint

quote:
Except for the fact in the "last" one, chronologically it's the first one....And you can't see if he has the ball yet. No one doubts he touched the bag at some point, we are doubtful he stayed in contact when the throw pulled him off.

Changed those pics around and you have proof positive he wasn't on the bag.

Question being, when did he have the ball in possession

Wrong.
The last pic is in order---the first baseman moves his foot back to the bag after the catch.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board